Lester Dent’s Master Plot Formula

About a week ago, I posted Mark Teppo’s Outline Your Novel in 90 Minutes. At the end of the outlining process, he suggested several other tools people could use to figure out what style or approach is best for them.

One of those tools was Lester Dent’s Master Plot Formula. Lester Dent (1904-1959) was a pulp fiction writer best known for his Doc Savage series.

And what luck going through posts in my old blog to come across Lester Dent’s method. Especially since I’ve been working up some plans for a few fantasy shorts to balance out my epic fantasies.

Lester Dent:

This is a formula, a master plot, for any 6000 word pulp story. It has worked on adventure, detective, western and war-air. It tells exactly where to put everything. It shows definitely just what must happen in each successive thousand words.

No yarn of mine (Lester Dent’s) written to the formula has yet failed to sell.

The business of building stories seems not much different from the business of building anything else.

Here’s how it starts:

1. A DIFFERENT MURDER METHOD FOR VILLAIN TO USE
2. A DIFFERENT THING FOR VILLAIN TO BE SEEKING
3. A DIFFERENT LOCALE
4. A MENACE WHICH IS TO HANG LIKE A CLOUD OVER HERO

One of these DIFFERENT things would be nice, two better, three swell. It may help if they are fully in mind before tackling the rest.

A different murder method could be–different. Thinking of shooting, knifing, hydrocyanic, garroting, poison needles, scorpions, a few others, and writing them on paper gets them where they may suggest something. Scorpions and their poison bite? Maybe mosquitos or flies treated with deadly germs?

If the victims are killed by ordinary methods, but found under strange and identical circumstances each time, it might serve, the reader of course not knowing until the end, that the method of murder is ordinary. Scribes who have their villain’s victims found with butterflies, spiders or bats stamped on them could conceivably be flirting with this gag.

Probably it won’t do a lot of good to be too odd, fanciful or grotesque with murder methods.

The different thing for the villain to be after might be something other than jewels, the stolen bank loot, the pearls, or some other old ones.

Here, again one might get too bizarre.

Unique locale? Easy. Selecting one that fits in with the murder method and the treasure–thing that villain wants–makes it simpler, and it’s also nice to use a familiar one, a place where you’ve lived or worked. So many pulpateers don’t. It sometimes saves embarrassment to know nearly as much about the locale as the editor, or enough to fool him.

Here’s a nifty much used in faking local color. For a story laid in Egypt, say, author finds a book titled “Conversational Egyptian Easily Learned,” or something like that. He wants a character to ask in Egyptian, “What’s the matter?” He looks in the book and finds, “El khabar, eyh?” To keep the reader from getting dizzy, it’s perhaps wise to make it clear in some fashion, just what that means. Occasionally the text will tell this, or someone can repeat it in English. But it’s a doubtful move to stop and tell the reader in so many words the English translation.

The writer learns they have palm trees in Egypt. He looks in the book, finds the Egyptian for palm trees, and uses that. This kids editors and readers into thinking he knows something about Egypt.

Here’s the second installment of the master plot.

Divide the 6000 word yarn into four 1500 word parts. In each 1500 word part, put the following:

FIRST 1500 WORDS

1–First line, or as near thereto as possible, introduce the hero and swat him with a fistful of trouble. Hint at a mystery, a menace or a problem to be solved–something the hero has to cope with.

2–The hero pitches in to cope with his fistful of trouble. (He tries to fathom the mystery, defeat the menace, or solve the problem.)

3–Introduce ALL the other characters as soon as possible. Bring them on in action.

4–Hero’s endevours land him in an actual physical conflict near the end of the first 1500 words.

5–Near the end of first 1500 words, there is a complete surprise twist in the plot development.

SO FAR: Does it have SUSPENSE?
Is there a MENACE to the hero?
Does everything happen logically?

At this point, it might help to recall that action should do something besides advance the hero over the scenery. Suppose the hero has learned the dastards of villains have seized somebody named Eloise, who can explain the secret of what is behind all these sinister events. The hero corners villains, they fight, and villains get away. Not so hot.

Hero should accomplish something with his tearing around, if only to rescue Eloise, and surprise! Eloise is a ring-tailed monkey. The hero counts the rings on Eloise’s tail, if nothing better comes to mind. They’re not real. The rings are painted there. Why?

SECOND 1500 WORDS

1–Shovel more grief onto the hero.

2–Hero, being heroic, struggles, and his struggles lead up to:

3–Another physical conflict.

4–A surprising plot twist to end the 1500 words.

NOW: Does second part have SUSPENSE?
Does the MENACE grow like a black cloud?
Is the hero getting it in the neck?
Is the second part logical?

DON’T TELL ABOUT IT***Show how the thing looked. This is one of the secrets of writing; never tell the reader–show him. (He trembles, roving eyes, slackened jaw, and such.) MAKE THE READER SEE HIM.

When writing, it helps to get at least one minor surprise to the printed page. It is reasonable to to expect these minor surprises to sort of inveigle the reader into keeping on. They need not be such profound efforts. One method of accomplishing one now and then is to be gently misleading. Hero is examining the murder room. The door behind him begins slowly to open. He does not see it. He conducts his examination blissfully. Door eases open, wider and wider, until–surprise! The glass pane falls out of the big window across the room. It must have fallen slowly, and air blowing into the room caused the door to open. Then what the heck made the pane fall so slowly? More mystery.

Characterizing a story actor consists of giving him some things which make him stick in the reader’s mind. TAG HIM.

BUILD YOUR PLOTS SO THAT ACTION CAN BE CONTINUOUS.

THIRD 1500 WORDS

1–Shovel the grief onto the hero.

2–Hero makes some headway, and corners the villain or somebody in:

3–A physical conflict.

4–A surprising plot twist, in which the hero preferably gets it in the neck bad, to end the 1500 words.

DOES: It still have SUSPENSE?
The MENACE getting blacker?
The hero finds himself in a hell of a fix?
It all happens logically?

These outlines or master formulas are only something to make you certain of inserting some physical conflict, and some genuine plot twists, with a little suspense and menace thrown in. Without them, there is no pulp story.

These physical conflicts in each part might be DIFFERENT, too. If one fight is with fists, that can take care of the pugilism until next the next yarn. Same for poison gas and swords. There may, naturally, be exceptions. A hero with a peculiar punch, or a quick draw, might use it more than once.

The idea is to avoid monotony.

ACTION:
Vivid, swift, no words wasted. Create suspense, make the reader see and feel the action.

ATMOSPHERE:
Hear, smell, see, feel and taste.

DESCRIPTION:
Trees, wind, scenery and water.

THE SECRET OF ALL WRITING IS TO MAKE EVERY WORD COUNT.

FOURTH 1500 WORDS

1–Shovel the difficulties more thickly upon the hero.

2–Get the hero almost buried in his troubles. (Figuratively, the villain has him prisoner and has him framed for a murder rap; the girl is presumably dead, everything is lost, and the DIFFERENT murder method is about to dispose of the suffering protagonist.)

3–The hero extricates himself using HIS OWN SKILL, training or brawn.

4–The mysteries remaining–one big one held over to this point will help grip interest–are cleared up in course of final conflict as hero takes the situation in hand.

5–Final twist, a big surprise, (This can be the villain turning out to be the unexpected person, having the “Treasure” be a dud, etc.)

6–The snapper, the punch line to end it.

HAS: The SUSPENSE held out to the last line?
The MENACE held out to the last?
Everything been explained?
It all happen logically?
Is the Punch Line enough to leave the reader with that WARM FEELING?
Did God kill the villain? Or the hero?

 

Outlining Your Novel in 90 Minutes

In closing down my old blog, there are a few more posts I would like to transfer over because I feel they have value. And with Norwescon 38 (2015) coming up in two weeks, I thought I would start with this one. 

 

Flipping through my panel notes from past conventions, (this one from Norwescon 2011) I came across Mark Teppo’s Outline a Novel in 90 Minutes. Mark’s method gave my characters the in-depth boost I’ve been struggling for.
The questions:

1. What distinguishes your protagonist from everyone else? Why are you writing about this person? (Don’t focus on physical appearance or who they are.)

2. As the book opens, what is your protagonist doing or about to do that is interesting? Keep in mind Kurt Vonnegut’s rule to enter into the story as late as possible. (The back story will come later. See near the end of the blog.)

3. What external situation will influence, shape or affect your protagonist throughout the course of this book? (or) What is the external/internal stressor that is going to be applied to your protagonist? (What is the conflict?)

4. What is the protagonist’s goal in this story? What does this character want? (May not reflect the main plot.)

5. Who is the protagonist’s mirror? (Friend, love interest, antagonist). Who would be the other character in the story you would use to define the protagonist based on their interactions with this character?

6. What obstacles are going to stand in your protagonist’s way? (Old school rules required three. There could be more or less.)

7. What qualities of the protagonist are going to help or hinder them in overcoming the above obstacles? Why is this person right for the job? (If you don’t think your protagonist has the proper tools to overcome these obstacles, rethink your protagonist. Characters have to operate at the best of their ability.)

8. How will the protagonist change over the course of the story? (Characters in serial fiction may or may not change.)

9. What is the authorial goal of telling the story of this character? Are they going to succeed or fail? Why or why not? Why did you make that choice? (In simpler terms, why is this story important?)

Now, write a one line description for (25) chapters. If each chapter averaged 3K, that is a 75K novel outlined and ready for writing.

Your first four chapters should answer questions 1 through 4, in no particular order. Chapter 5 should address your first obstacle. Chapter 23 or 24 is the answer to question number 9, which is the sacrifice. Chapter 25 is the answer to question number 8. (How has the protagonist changed?)

Guidelines if you get stuck:

First act: Introduce your characters and world they live in. That will ground you to what’s going on. It provides the rules, then have something happen. Your main character is thrust out of their comfortable surroundings. The meat of the story is for the protagonist to overcome the obstacles set in their way.

Second act: Everything around your character collapses. Nothing’s going to work.

Third act. Something happens which enables the protagonist to move through to the end.

Points to consider for this guideline suggestion:

Does your first act break around chapter 6?

Does your third act break around chapter 18?

The second act may be a good place to seed any back story.

What is the definition of a chapter? By the end of each chapter, something major has to have changed or the character should have discovered something new that changed their perception. The following chapter may cover their reaction or their decision to act.

So now go out and outline.